Hourly to Salary Calculator

Four pay figures from three inputs

An hourly wage hides its yearly size behind small conversation units: "25 an hour" says nothing about unpaid leave, weeks actually worked or the monthly bank figure. This page multiplies rate × hours × weeks and decomposes the result into the four natural pay periods — yearly, monthly (yearly ÷ 12), weekly (rate × hours) and per day (a five-day week). It also prints the per-day and per-week figures so that budgeting conversations — rent, insurance, savings — can happen in the unit the bill arrives in.

The weekly figure is the honest anchor: 25 an hour at 40 hours is 1,000 a week, and the yearly 52,000 is just that anchor times 52. Monthly at 4,333.33 is a pure arithmetic artefact (yearly ÷ 12), not a promise that any month actually brings 4,333.33 — real months have different weekly counts, and the yearly figure is the one that survives.

A worked example, step by step

Problem: a colleague earns 25 an hour, works 40 hours a week, and is paid for all 52 weeks. Then a second case: a part-timer at 18 an hour, 37.5 hours a week, 50 weeks a year. How do their years compare?

1. Yearly 1: 25 × 40 × 52 = 52,000.
2. Weekly 1: 25 × 40 = 1,000. Daily 1: 1,000 ÷ 5 = 200.
3. Monthly 1: 52,000 ÷ 12 = 4,333.33.
4. Yearly 2: 18 × 37.5 × 50 = 33,750.
5. Weekly 2: 18 × 37.5 = 675. Daily 2: 675 ÷ 5 = 135. Monthly 2: 33,750 ÷ 12 = 2,812.50.

The gap — 52,000 against 33,750 — is 54.1% more for the first case, and the decomposition shows exactly where it comes from: both the rate (+38.9%, 25 against 18) and the annual hours (+37.4%, 2,080 against 1,875) run higher. Job-offer comparisons live and die at exactly this dissection, not at the headline rate.

The same job at different weeks per year

Unpaid leave, sabbaticals and term-time contracts all reduce weeks. For the 25-an-hour, 40-hour role:

The pattern is linear — every unpaid week costs exactly 1,000 — which is why the weeks field deserves more respect than it usually gets. A 46-week job at a higher nominal wage can lose to a 52-week job at a lower one.

Running the conversion backwards

The same identity reads in reverse: a salaried 52,000 at 40 hours over 52 weeks is 25 an hour, and any salary divided by (hours × weeks) returns the hourly equivalent. That reverse is how you compare a fixed salary against hourly offers with different hours or weeks — and why the tool's three inputs are the exact minimum contract details worth knowing before signing anything: not just the rate, but the weeks and hours it assumes.

Mistakes that quietly understate a wage

• Quoting monthly at yearly ÷ 12 as if a month pays it. Some months hold four payweeks, others five; only the yearly figure is contract-real.
• Using 52 weeks when the contract pays 48. Four unpaid weeks cost a full month of headline pay in the comparison.
• Forgetting overtime. Regular hours × rate is the base; premium hours belong in an overtime calculation, on top.
• Comparing gross with net. All outputs here are gross; tax and social deductions land later.
• Dividing a salary by 52 alone. Without hours per week, the hourly comparison is not defined; the reverse conversion needs rate, hours and weeks together.

Keep exploring

• Overtime Pay Calculator — add premium hours at 1.5× or 2× to a week's gross pay.
• Compound Interest Calculator — what a saved slice of that yearly figure becomes over years.
• Loan Payment Calculator — what share of the monthly figure a realistic car or mortgage payment swallows.
• Guide: How Loan Payments Work.